爱华网最近，我在“企业战略管理”课堂上向学生推荐了一部商战小说：《圈子圈套》，学生读后果然反响强烈。故事结构并不复杂，讲的是三家国际软件巨头的中国代理怎样在中国相互斗智斗勇，抢夺大客户，但情节生动，使人如临其境。学生看了以后，似乎觉得他们日思夜想的跨国公司梦近在眼前。
Recently, I am in the strategic enterprise management clato students recommended a war novel: "circle trap", reading was a strong response. The story structure is not complex, Chinese is about three international software giant douyong in Chinese agent how to battle each other, seizing large customers, but the plot is vivid, make people feel real. After the students read, seemed to think they have a dream in front of multinational companies.
然而，要是鲁迅先生看了会有什么感觉?会不会像看发生在中国大地上的日俄战争纪录片一样，再一次翻然醒悟，弃医从文，疗救那已近麻木的国民心灵呢?还是会哀叹百年轮回，放弃努力，转而学习其中的战略战术、组织建制、尚武精神，以便将来到日本或俄国军队去服役，混个上尉、少校?
However, what would it be like to see Mr. Lu Xun? Would like to see in Chinese earth of the Russo Japanese War documentary, again disillusioned, from medicine, healing the national heart nearly numb? Will lament 100 years of reincarnation, give up, to learn the strategy and tactics, organization, martial spirit, in order to come to Japan or the Russian army to serve, mix a captain, major?
这是摆在国人面前一个或许已经不问题的问题。
This is placed in front of the people may not have a problem.
向跨国公司学习，向跨国公司致敬，感谢跨国公司，加入跨国公司，已经成为一种广泛的社会思潮，甚至已经成为一种莫名其妙的崇拜情结。本来，MBA的学员都有实际工作的经历，应该有点起码的分辨能力。但是，只要是有外籍教师授课的，挂了外国大学旗号的，收费就可以高出一倍多。学员也不想一想，听外籍教师讲课，到底是学英语听力，还是学商业管理?到中国来的外籍教师，恐怕在本国混得并不好。钱来得并不容易，但这种崇拜情结却使他们心甘情愿地掏腰包，无非要沾点洋气。
To learn from multinational companies, to pay tribute to multinational companies, thanks to multinational companies, to join the multinational companies, has become a widespread social trends, and even has become a kind of inexplicable worship complex. Originally, MBA students have practical work experience, should be a little at least the ability to distinguish. However, as long as there are foreign teachers to teach, hanging the banner of foreign universities, the charge can be more than doubled. Students do not want to think, listen to foreign teachers lecture, in the end is to learn English listening, or businemanagement? Foreign teachers who come to China, I'm afraid I don't mix well. The money is not easy, but this makes them most willing to worship to dig into their pockets, only to get enough.
诚然，跨国公司在品牌、技术、营销上有许多值得学习的地方，但是，跨国公司到中国来毕竟是要赚钱的，是冲着中国市场来的，客观上会成为中国企业的最强大的敌手。中国加入WTO前夕，一家证券公司再三邀请我参加一个WTO研讨会，就加入WTO的利弊向20多家跨国公司的中国区高管作个报告。到会上，一个感觉得到强烈的印证，这些跨国公司才是真正主宰中国的力量，而这些中国区的中方高管则是新时代的洋买办。我开场就问：“以在座诸位母公司的品牌、技术、组织优势，怎样看中国市场?是不居高临下，一览无余?如果是，那么，作为你们的竞争对手，中国企业一定会感到兵临城下，四面楚歌!这就是我对加入WTO后中国市场竞争格局的基本判断，也是我反对立即无条件加入WTO的基本理由。”
Indeed, multinational companies in the brand, technology, marketing has many places worth learning, but multinational companies to China is to make money, is directed to the Chinese market, the objective will be to become the most powerful rival China enterprises. On the eve of China's accession to the WTO, a securities company has repeatedly invited me to participate in a WTO Seminar on the pros and cons of joining the WTO to report to the executives of more than and 20 multinational companies in china. At the meeting, a strong sense that these multinational corporations is the real master of China power, and these Chinese area Chinese executives is a new era of foreign comprador. I asked, "how do you look at the Chinese market in terms of the brand, technology and organization of the parent company? Is not condescending glance? If it is, then, as your competitors, China enterprises will be besieged on all sides the enemy approached the walls! This is my basic judgment of the Chinese market competition after joining the WTO, but also the basic reason why I oppose the unconditional entry of WTO."
一晃六年过去了。今年两会期间，由中国工程院院士、香港工程科学院副院长陈清泉领衔，三十多位港澳籍全国政协委员(绝大部分都是香港资本巨头)联名提案《加强支柱产业自主创新，防范经济殖民地化》。提案指出：“我国三大支柱产业的产业主权的80%已为外方所控制或主导。2005年我国信息产业(制造业)总产值的77%、增加值的79%为外方(三资企业)所主导，汽车工业(轿车工业)90%的产品为外方所主导，机械工业85的芯片精密制造设备、70%的数控与机械制造设备、80%的石油化工生产制造设备为国外所占领。这对我国的经济、科技、人才、国防、政治等国家重大安全，都将造成严重威胁。”
As in the past six years. NPC and CPPCC during this year, led by Chen Qingquan, vice president of the Academy of Sciences, Hongkong Academy of Engineering China engineering, more than thirty of Hong Kong and Macao membership of the CPPCC National Committee (the majority is Hongkong capital giant) joint proposal "to strengthen the pillar industry of independent innovation, to prevent economic colonization". The proposal pointed out: "China's three pillar industries of industrial sovereignty has been controlled or dominated by foreign countries.". In 2005, China's information industry (Manufacturing) of the total output value of 77%, 79% of the value added (for foreign funded enterprises) dominated, automobile industry (car industry) 90% are dominated by foreign oil, chemical manufacturing equipment machinery industry 85 chip precision manufacturing equipment, 70% CNC machinery manufacturing and equipment, 80% the Institute for foreign occupation. This will be a serious threat to China's economy, science and technology, human resources, national defense, politics and other national security."
我对香港的资本巨头素来并无好感，但一读他们的提案，竟觉得他们的爱国心、洞察力比内地的许多官员、学者强百倍!他们久经国际商场，比我们一些浅薄无知的官员更清楚，跨国公司所到之处，当地的自主创新就会变得很困难。首先是市场策略上。当本国自主创新的产品还没有面世时，他们的产品可以攫取高额垄断利润。一旦本国产品面世，他们马上会将价格压得很低，使本国产品不得不赔本销售，高昂的研发成本无法回报，研发团队士气涣散，队伍瓦解。其次是人才战略上。跨国公司以学术交流、考察的名义，很容易了解到谁是中国企业研发队伍中的核心人才，以高于中国数倍或数十倍的薪水将此人挖走，就可以使中国长期的技术投资归零。第三是技术战略上。如果中国真的研发出了具有国际竞争力的产品，例如西安西电捷通通讯公司的WAPI技术，跨国电信巨头就联起手来，以他们掌握的国际技术标准霸权加以封杀。第四是政治战略。跨国公司对各国政府的经济决策部门都有强大的影响力，他们到中国来，或者找业务能力强的人，或者找政治后台硬的人作代理，或者用出国考察、学术交流的名义贿赂中国官员，在国外为他们开设账户，在国内为他们提供无限额的消费信用卡。相反，中国的自主创新企业却缺乏如此强大的政治影响力。部门利益的考虑常常使一项自主创新技术只能得到本部门的保证，得不到其他部门的配合。例如，中国的大飞机只能得到航空制造业的重视，却得不到民航
I do not have a good impression of Hongkong's capital giants, but when they read the proposal, they feel that their patriotism, insight than many of the mainland officials, scholars hundred times! They have the international market, than some of our superficial officials more clearly, multinational companies everywhere, independent innovation will become very difficult local. The first is the market strategy. When the country's own innovative products have not yet available, their products can grab high monopoly profits. Once their products available, they will immediately price pressure is very low, so that their products have to be sold at a loss, high development cost can not return, and the R & D team morale, team collapse. Followed by the talent strategy. Multinational companies on behalf of academic exchange and investigation, it is easy to understand who is the core talent Chinese enterprise R & D team, with more than China several times or dozens of times the salary will be dug, you can make Chinese investment long-term return to zero. Third is the technical strategy. If China really developed with the international competitiveneof products, such as the Xi'an communications company WAPI Xidian Jietong technology, multinational telecommunications giants join forces to be blocked by hegemony international technical standards they have. Fourth is the political strategy. The economic decision-making departments of the governments of transnational corporations have strong influence, they come to China, or find a strong businebackground, or find political hard man for the agency, or study abroad, academic exchanges in the name of China bribe officials, open accounts for them in foreign countries, an unlimited amount of consumer credit card for them at home. On the contrary, China's independent innovation enterprises lack such a powerful political influence. The consideration of departmental interests often makes an independent innovation technology can only be guaranteed by the Department, and can not get the cooperation of other departments. For example, China's large aircraft can only get the attention of the aviation industry, but not the Civil Aviation
